P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 485 (19 September 2003)

P. E. C. v Lesquende Ltd. [2003] JLR 485 (19 September 2003)

The word 'scheme' in the context of the Pointe Gourde principle is not limited in meaning and can encompass a range of activities, including re-zoning, provided there is sufficient factual linkage to the particular scheme.

Citation
[2003] JLR 485
Parties
Applicant: P. E. C.; Respondent: Lesquende Ltd.
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
19 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Compulsory Purchase Compensation / Judgment
Outcome
judgment on interpretation of compensation principles
Legal Topics
Compensation Principles, Pointe Gourde Principle, Meaning of 'scheme'
Planning Law Compulsory Purchase Compensation Principles Pointe Gourde Principle Meaning of 'scheme'

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

P. E. C.

Applicant

Lesquende Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Compulsory Purchase Compensation / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Interpretation of the word 'scheme' under the Pointe Gourde principle in compulsory purchase compensation

Ratio Decidendi

The word 'scheme' in the context of the Pointe Gourde principle is not limited in meaning and can encompass a range of activities, including re-zoning, provided there is sufficient factual linkage to the particular scheme.

Court Disposition

judgment on interpretation of compensation principles