Pacific Invs. Ltd. v Christensen [1996] JLR_Note 7b (03 September 1996)
Privileged or irrelevant parts of a document may be severed when produced under subpoena duces tecum.
- Parties
- Applicant: Pacific Invs. Ltd.; Respondent: Christensen
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Production of Documents, Subpoena Duces Tecum, Privilege, Relevance, Severance of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Pacific Invs. Ltd.
Applicant
Christensen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether privileged or irrelevant information in documents produced under subpoena duces tecum can be severed
Ratio Decidendi
Privileged or irrelevant parts of a document may be severed when produced under subpoena duces tecum.
Court Disposition
application allowed in part
Orders
- Privileged or irrelevant parts of documents may be severed before production
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment