AG v Page [2001] JRC 56 (02 March 2001)

AG v Page [2001] JRC 56 (02 March 2001)

The defendant's failure to take advantage of probation and commission of further offences warranted discharge of probation and imposition of substantial custodial sentences, with proper consideration of remand time and mitigating factors.

Citation
[2001] JRC 56
Parties
Defendant: Page; Prosecutor: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
02 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
probation order discharged; custodial sentences imposed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Probation Order Discharge, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences
Criminal Law Sentencing Probation Order Discharge Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Page

Defendant

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 appropriate sentencing for breach of probation and new offences
  2. 2 consideration of mitigating factors and time spent on remand

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant's failure to take advantage of probation and commission of further offences warranted discharge of probation and imposition of substantial custodial sentences, with proper consideration of remand time and mitigating factors.

Court Disposition

probation order discharged; custodial sentences imposed

Orders

  • Probation order discharged.
  • Sentenced to 16 months' imprisonment (counts 1-16, concurrent) for original indictment.