1998/209 - Fields v Parish Rate Appeal Board [1998] UR 209 (21 October 1998)
Given the unique circumstances of the case, the novelty of the Board's existence, and the need to avoid the rate payer being unfairly out of pocket, indemnity costs are awarded to the Representor, despite the absence of bad faith or improper conduct by the Board.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 209
- Parties
- Representor: Fiona Catherina Fields, née Harvie-Smith; Respondent: Parish Rate Appeal Board
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Costs
- Outcome
- Indemnity costs awarded to the Representor.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Indemnity Costs, Judicial Review, Assessment of Rateable Value
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fiona Catherina Fields, née Harvie-Smith
Representor
Parish Rate Appeal Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether indemnity costs should be awarded against the Parish Rate Appeal Board following a successful judicial review of its decision on rateable value assessment.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the unique circumstances of the case, the novelty of the Board's existence, and the need to avoid the rate payer being unfairly out of pocket, indemnity costs are awarded to the Representor, despite the absence of bad faith or improper conduct by the Board.
Court Disposition
Indemnity costs awarded to the Representor.
Orders
- Order for indemnity costs in favour of the Representor against the Parish Rate Appeal Board.
- Application by Respondent for leave to appeal against the costs order refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment