1999/160 - Gill v AG [1999] UR 160 (29 September 1999)
The sentence of 4 years' imprisonment for a violent robbery involving a knife, threat to kill, and physical assault on a young cashier was not manifestly excessive. Mitigating factors were properly considered but did not outweigh the seriousness of the offence. Alcohol addiction was aggravating. The application for leave to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [1999] UR 160
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Martin Gill; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Larceny, Sentencing, Mitigating Factors, Aggravating Factors, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Martin Gill
Appellant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 4 years' imprisonment for robbery was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigating factors in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 4 years' imprisonment for a violent robbery involving a knife, threat to kill, and physical assault on a young cashier was not manifestly excessive. Mitigating factors were properly considered but did not outweigh the seriousness of the offence. Alcohol addiction was aggravating. The application for leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment