Pell Frischmann v Bow Valley [2007] JLR_Note 38 (31 May 2007)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Civil / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined whether the respondent misused confidential information belonging to the applicant.
02
Material facts
Parties
Pell Frischmann
ApplicantBow Valley
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether there was misuse of confidential information
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant alleges misuse of confidential information by the respondent.
- Respondent
- Respondent denies misuse of confidential information.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
common law
Misuse of confidential information is actionable under intellectual property law.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined whether the respondent misused confidential information belonging to the applicant.
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Pell Frischmann v Bow Valley [2007] JLR_Note 38 (31 May 2007) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2007/JLR07N038.html Cite as: [2007] JLR_Note 38 [ New search ] [ Help ] Pell Frischmann v Bow Valley 2007 JLR Note 38 (31 May 2007) Intellectual Property-confidential information-misuse of confidential information The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2007 JLR Note 38 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2007/JLR07N038.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.