Perczynski v Perczynski [2005] JLR_Note 23 (16 June 2005)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Civil / Not Specified
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined the appropriateness of the Order of Justice for the suit in question.
Court disposition
not specified
02
Material facts
Parties
Perczynski
ApplicantPerczynski
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Not Specified
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the Order of Justice is the appropriate procedure for the suit
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey civil procedure rules
Order of Justice is the prescribed procedure for certain civil suits.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined the appropriateness of the Order of Justice for the suit in question.
Court disposition
not specified
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Perczynski v Perczynski [2005] JLR_Note 23 (16 June 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR05N023.html Cite as: [2005] JLR_Note 23 [ New search ] [ Help ] Perczynski v Perczynski 2005 JLR Note 23 (16 June 2005) Civil Procedure-Order of Justice-suits for which appropriate The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR Note 23 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR05N023.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.