Michel and Gallichan -v- AG [2007] JCA 009 (16 January 2007)
Mr. Michel has the means to pay a reasonable costs order; £20,000 is a fair figure for both applications, and £10,000 is ordered against Mr. Michel. Mrs. Gallichan lacks capacity and made no profit from her criminal activity, so no order is made against her.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] JCA 009
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Wilson Michel; Applicant: Simone Anne Gallichan; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Costs Application / Post Dismissal of Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Costs order made against Mr. Michel; no order against Mrs. Gallichan.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Criminal Cases, Discretion in Awarding Costs, Capacity to Pay, Compensation Vs Punishment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Wilson Michel
Applicant
Simone Anne Gallichan
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Costs Application / Post Dismissal of Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Should costs be awarded against unsuccessful applicants for leave to appeal?
- 2 What principles govern the exercise of discretion in awarding costs?
- 3 How should the applicants' capacity to pay be assessed?
Ratio Decidendi
Mr. Michel has the means to pay a reasonable costs order; £20,000 is a fair figure for both applications, and £10,000 is ordered against Mr. Michel. Mrs. Gallichan lacks capacity and made no profit from her criminal activity, so no order is made against her.
Court Disposition
Costs order made against Mr. Michel; no order against Mrs. Gallichan.
Orders
- Mr. Michel to pay £10,000 to the Attorney General.
- No costs order against Mrs. Gallichan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment