Peters v Molloy [1996] JRC 219 (22 November 1996)

Peters v Molloy [1996] JRC 219 (22 November 1996)

The court found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to perform as agreed.

Citation
[1996] JRC 219
Parties
Applicant: Peters; Respondent: Molloy
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
22 November 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for applicant
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peters

Applicant

Molloy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the respondent breached the contract with the applicant

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to perform as agreed.

Court Disposition

judgment for applicant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay damages to applicant