Dalemont -v- Senatorov and Others [2012] JRC 014 (12 January 2012)
The Royal Court of Jersey has jurisdiction to order worldwide disclosure of assets by a non-resident defendant in a post-judgment case, and discretion should be exercised to maintain such an order where assets have been concealed through offshore structures and substantial justice would otherwise be denied.
- Citation
- [2012] JRC 014
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff (Cyprus registered entity); First Defendant: First Defendant (Russian national); Second Defendant: Second Defendant (Jersey foundation); Third Defendant: Third Defendant (BVI incorporated entity); Fourth Defendant: Fourth Defendant (Cyprus incorporated entity)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application by Summons to Vary Interim Orders / Post Judgment, Hearing on Variation of Ex Parte Orders
- Outcome
- Application to vary disclosure order dismissed; worldwide disclosure order maintained.
- Legal Topics
- Worldwide Disclosure Orders, Jurisdiction, Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Corporate Veil Piercing, Pauline Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff (Cyprus registered entity)
Plaintiff
First Defendant (Russian national)
First Defendant
Second Defendant (Jersey foundation)
Second Defendant
Third Defendant (BVI incorporated entity)
Third Defendant
Fourth Defendant (Cyprus incorporated entity)
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application by Summons to Vary Interim Orders / Post Judgment, Hearing on Variation of Ex Parte Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Royal Court of Jersey has jurisdiction to order worldwide disclosure of assets by a non-resident defendant
- 2 Whether discretion should be exercised to maintain a worldwide disclosure order in a post-judgment case
Ratio Decidendi
The Royal Court of Jersey has jurisdiction to order worldwide disclosure of assets by a non-resident defendant in a post-judgment case, and discretion should be exercised to maintain such an order where assets have been concealed through offshore structures and substantial justice would otherwise be denied.
Court Disposition
Application to vary disclosure order dismissed; worldwide disclosure order maintained.
Orders
- First defendant's obligation to disclose worldwide assets remains in force.
- Time for disclosure not extended beyond original order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment