Gheewala v Compendium 28-Nov-2006 [2006] JRC 170 (28 November 2006)

Gheewala v Compendium 28-Nov-2006 [2006] JRC 170 (28 November 2006)

The Plaintiff, having lost locus standi after the Kenyan court upheld the 1976 will, must withdraw the action, pay the costs of the other parties, and is barred from bringing a subsequent action without leave of the Court and until costs are paid.

Citation
[2006] JRC 170
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Compendium; Defendant: Mukta
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
28 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Probate Dispute / Final Judgment
Outcome
Action withdrawn on terms; costs awarded against Plaintiff; subsequent action barred without leave; stay pending resealing of Kenyan Grant; Grant of Letters of Administration revoked.
Legal Topics
Will Validity, Grant of Probate, Costs, Withdrawal of Action, Subsequent Action Inhibition
Probate Civil Procedure Will Validity Grant of Probate Costs Withdrawal of Action Subsequent Action Inhibition

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Compendium

Defendant

Mukta

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate Dispute / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 1976 will was validly executed
  2. 2 Whether the Plaintiff has locus standi after the Kenyan court's decision
  3. 3 Appropriate orders regarding costs, withdrawal, and future actions

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff, having lost locus standi after the Kenyan court upheld the 1976 will, must withdraw the action, pay the costs of the other parties, and is barred from bringing a subsequent action without leave of the Court and until costs are paid.

Court Disposition

Action withdrawn on terms; costs awarded against Plaintiff; subsequent action barred without leave; stay pending resealing of Kenyan Grant; Grant of Letters of Administration revoked.

Orders

  • Action withdrawn on terms as to costs and subsequent action inhibition.
  • Plaintiff to pay taxed costs to Compendium and Mukta on the standard basis from inception to date.