Flynn -v- Reid [2012] JRC 121A (18 June 2012)
Given the Plaintiff succeeded on only one of four grounds and both parties were on legal aid, the justice of the case required apportionment of costs: Defendant to pay 60% of Plaintiff's costs (capped at £16,000), Plaintiff to pay 40% of Defendant's costs (capped at £8,000), reflecting partial success and the capped legal aid exposure.
- Citation
- [2012] JRC 121A
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (quasi Matrimonial Property Dispute) / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Costs apportioned: Defendant to pay 60% of Plaintiff's costs (capped at £16,000); Plaintiff to pay 40% of Defendant's costs (capped at £8,000).
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Unjust Enrichment, Quasi Matrimonial Proceedings, Legal Aid, Apportionment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (quasi Matrimonial Property Dispute) / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should follow the event in quasi-matrimonial proceedings
- 2 How to apportion costs where both parties are partially successful and on legal aid
- 3 Whether to cap costs exposure for each party
Ratio Decidendi
Given the Plaintiff succeeded on only one of four grounds and both parties were on legal aid, the justice of the case required apportionment of costs: Defendant to pay 60% of Plaintiff's costs (capped at £16,000), Plaintiff to pay 40% of Defendant's costs (capped at £8,000), reflecting partial success and the capped legal aid exposure.
Court Disposition
Costs apportioned: Defendant to pay 60% of Plaintiff's costs (capped at £16,000); Plaintiff to pay 40% of Defendant's costs (capped at £8,000).
Orders
- Defendant to pay 60% of Plaintiff's costs, not exceeding £16,000.
- Plaintiff to pay 40% of Defendant's costs, not exceeding £8,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment