Bespoke Investments -v- Lincoln Nominees and Ors [2005] JRC 117 (18 August 2005)

Bespoke Investments -v- Lincoln Nominees and Ors [2005] JRC 117 (18 August 2005)

There was no clear case of something having gone wrong in the application of the 15% discount to the plaintiff's costs, and no realistic prospect of the appeal succeeding; therefore, leave to appeal was refused.

Citation
[2005] JRC 117
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
18 August 2005
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Order
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Orders, Judicial Discretion
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Orders Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the costs judgment, specifically the 15% discount applied to the plaintiff's costs

Ratio Decidendi

There was no clear case of something having gone wrong in the application of the 15% discount to the plaintiff's costs, and no realistic prospect of the appeal succeeding; therefore, leave to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defendant to pay plaintiff's costs of the application on a standard basis