McGorrin v Pascoe [2001] JRC 202 (01 October 2001)
The Court found that the Master's discretion was properly exercised in refusing to strike out the action and granting an extension of time, given the exceptional circumstances including the Defendant's death, admissions regarding funds, and ongoing English proceedings. The Court urged stringent steps to bring the matter to trial but declined to interfere with the Master's order.
- Citation
- [2001] JRC 202
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal From Master's Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Master's order upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Account for Funds, Delay in Prosecution, Interim Injunctions, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal From Master's Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master's refusal to strike out the action was correct
- 2 Whether the extension of time for filing a Scott Schedule was properly granted
- 3 Whether the Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action with sufficient expedition
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Master's discretion was properly exercised in refusing to strike out the action and granting an extension of time, given the exceptional circumstances including the Defendant's death, admissions regarding funds, and ongoing English proceedings. The Court urged stringent steps to bring the matter to trial but declined to interfere with the Master's order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Master's order upheld.
Orders
- No strike out of the action.
- Extension of time for filing Scott Schedule and issuing summons for directions granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment