Y v Minister for Children and Housing 29-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 092 (29 March 2021)

Y v Minister for Children and Housing 29-Mar-2021 [2021] JRC 092 (29 March 2021)

Unredacted documents should be provided to the plaintiff's legal advisers and relevant experts, but not to the plaintiff, to enable informed challenge to redactions and ensure confidence in legal advice, subject to strict safeguards and court orders. The defendant must justify redactions with precise reasons, and the balancing exercise must be conducted with both parties' advisers having access to unredacted material.

Citation
[2021] JRC 092
Parties
Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant (Children's Services)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
29 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory
Outcome
Interlocutory orders issued regarding disclosure and redaction procedure.
Legal Topics
Disclosure, Redaction, Confidentiality, Breach of Duty, Protection of Vulnerable Individuals
Civil Procedure Public Law Family Law Disclosure Redaction Confidentiality Breach of Duty Protection of Vulnerable Individuals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Plaintiff

Plaintiff

Defendant (Children's Services)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate approach to disclosure and redaction of sensitive documents in breach of duty claims against Children's Services
  2. 2 Balancing fair trial rights with privacy/confidentiality of third parties

Ratio Decidendi

Unredacted documents should be provided to the plaintiff's legal advisers and relevant experts, but not to the plaintiff, to enable informed challenge to redactions and ensure confidence in legal advice, subject to strict safeguards and court orders. The defendant must justify redactions with precise reasons, and the balancing exercise must be conducted with both parties' advisers having access to unredacted material.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory orders issued regarding disclosure and redaction procedure.

Orders

  • Unredacted documents to be provided to plaintiff's legal advisers and relevant experts, not to plaintiff, pending further order.
  • Unredacted documents may only be shared between legal advisers and specific experts authorised by the court.