Cole -v- States of Jersey Police [2008] JRC 191 (11 November 2008)
The court exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs, accepting the defendant's proposal not to enforce costs orders obtained in the Court of Appeal, and finding this best served justice between the parties given the litigation history and the settlement offer made by the defendant.
- Citation
- [2008] JRC 191
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- No order as to costs
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Offers to Settle, Breach of Confidence, Misuse of Private Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff or defendant is entitled to costs following judgment in a breach of confidence/misuse of private information claim
- 2 Whether the defendant's settlement offer should be treated as equivalent to a payment into court for costs purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The court exercised its discretion to make no order as to costs, accepting the defendant's proposal not to enforce costs orders obtained in the Court of Appeal, and finding this best served justice between the parties given the litigation history and the settlement offer made by the defendant.
Court Disposition
No order as to costs
Orders
- No order for costs; defendant will not enforce recent costs orders obtained in the Court of Appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment