Singleton v G Thatcher Felt Roofing [2002] JRC 105 (27 May 2002)
The court held that an interim payment of £5,000 was justified as it did not exceed a reasonable proportion of the likely damages, given the plaintiff's ongoing loss of earnings and the evidence available. The court could not definitively determine whether the plaintiff had mitigated his loss, but assumed in favour of the defendant for the purposes of this application.
- Citation
- [2002] JRC 105
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Payment of Damages / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- interim payment granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payments, Mitigation of Loss, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Payment of Damages / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a further interim payment of damages
- 2 Whether the plaintiff has mitigated his loss by seeking alternative employment
- 3 What constitutes a reasonable proportion of damages for interim payment
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that an interim payment of £5,000 was justified as it did not exceed a reasonable proportion of the likely damages, given the plaintiff's ongoing loss of earnings and the evidence available. The court could not definitively determine whether the plaintiff had mitigated his loss, but assumed in favour of the defendant for the purposes of this application.
Court Disposition
interim payment granted
Orders
- Defendant to make an interim payment of £5,000 to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment