Luis v Le Main [2003] JRC 207 (14 November 2003)
The defendant was primarily at fault for emerging onto St Clement's Road when it was unsafe, failing to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence for failing to keep a proper lookout, contributing to the accident to the extent of 25%.
- Citation
- [2003] JRC 207
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiff; Defendant: Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Road Traffic Accident Liability / Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Defendant liable to plaintiff with 25% reduction for contributory negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Road Traffic Accident Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Road Traffic Accident Liability / Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the defendant liable for the collision?
- 2 Did the plaintiff contribute to the accident by negligence?
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was primarily at fault for emerging onto St Clement's Road when it was unsafe, failing to keep a proper lookout. The plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence for failing to keep a proper lookout, contributing to the accident to the extent of 25%.
Court Disposition
Defendant liable to plaintiff with 25% reduction for contributory negligence.
Orders
- Defendant found liable for accident.
- Plaintiff's damages to be reduced by 25% for contributory negligence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment