Crociani -v- Crociani [2013] JRC 080 (19 April 2013)
The defendants are required to file a full answer before the forum challenge hearing to avoid undue delay and prejudice to the plaintiffs, despite the pending application for a stay on forum non conveniens grounds. Sequential filing of evidence is ordered, and the hearing date is vacated to allow fair preparation.
- Citation
- [2013] JRC 080
- Parties
- Applicant: Plaintiffs; Respondent: Defendants
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Litigation / Case Management Directions
- Outcome
- case management orders issued
- Legal Topics
- Forum Non Conveniens, Case Management, Jurisdiction, Trustee Appointment, Equitable Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs
Applicant
Defendants
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trust Litigation / Case Management Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether defendants must file an answer before determination of forum non conveniens application
- 2 Appropriate forum for trust dispute
- 3 Sequential vs mutual exchange of evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants are required to file a full answer before the forum challenge hearing to avoid undue delay and prejudice to the plaintiffs, despite the pending application for a stay on forum non conveniens grounds. Sequential filing of evidence is ordered, and the hearing date is vacated to allow fair preparation.
Court Disposition
case management orders issued
Orders
- Leave granted to defendants to amend summons dated 8 March 2013.
- 29 May 2013 hearing date vacated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment