Crociani -v- Crociani [2016] JRC 026 (28 January 2016)
The plaintiffs are entitled to a schedule of mistaken dispositions and a summary of the US and Italian tax advice received by the first defendant prior to establishing the Grand Trust, as these are necessary for the plaintiffs to know the case they have to meet. However, the plaintiffs' request for full details and documentation amounted to a request for evidence and went too far. The defendants must also provide a schedule of relevant tax requirements, including statutory provisions, at the time witness statements are exchanged.
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 026
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Plaintiffs; Defendant: First Defendant; Defendant: Second Defendant; Defendant: Fourth Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Further and Better Particulars / Interlocutory Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Requests for Further and Better Particulars, Pleadings, Discovery, Tax Advice Relevance, Mediation Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff
First Defendant
Defendant
Second Defendant
Defendant
Fourth Defendant
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Further and Better Particulars / Interlocutory Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to further and better particulars of the first, second and fourth defendants' amended answer and counterclaim, specifically regarding tax advice and mistaken dispositions.
- 2 Whether the defendants must provide a schedule of mistaken dispositions and a summary of US and Italian tax advice.
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiffs are entitled to a schedule of mistaken dispositions and a summary of the US and Italian tax advice received by the first defendant prior to establishing the Grand Trust, as these are necessary for the plaintiffs to know the case they have to meet. However, the plaintiffs' request for full details and documentation amounted to a request for evidence and went too far. The defendants must also provide a schedule of relevant tax requirements, including statutory provisions, at the time witness statements are exchanged.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- First, second and fourth defendants to provide a schedule of mistaken dispositions by 15 February 2016.
- First, second and fourth defendants to pay plaintiffs' costs on the standard basis up to 15 January 2016 for the first request, to be summarily assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment