Crociani -v- Crociani [2016] JRC 143 (23 August 2016)
Privilege and disclosure are governed by Jersey law as the forum court; privilege cannot be asserted by a trustee against beneficiaries for documents recording and explaining trustee deliberations when reasons for retirement and appointment are given. Communications solely between a party and its own legal adviser remain privileged. The fourth defendant must disclose relevant documents and file an affidavit explaining all circumstances leading to its retirement as trustee, including specified details.
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 143
- Parties
- Applicant: Plaintiffs; Respondent: First Defendant; Respondent: Second Defendant; Respondent: Fourth Defendant; Respondent: Eighth Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Litigation / Interlocutory Application for Discovery and Compliance With Prior Orders
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Retirement, Appointment of New Trustee, Disclosure and Privilege, Jurisdictional Disputes, Fiduciary Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plaintiffs
Applicant
First Defendant
Respondent
Second Defendant
Respondent
Fourth Defendant
Respondent
Eighth Defendant
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trust Litigation / Interlocutory Application for Discovery and Compliance With Prior Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the fourth defendant must disclose documents and file affidavits explaining its retirement as trustee
- 2 Whether privilege can be asserted over communications between trustees, beneficiaries, and their advisers
- 3 Whether Jersey or Mauritian law governs privilege and disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
Privilege and disclosure are governed by Jersey law as the forum court; privilege cannot be asserted by a trustee against beneficiaries for documents recording and explaining trustee deliberations when reasons for retirement and appointment are given. Communications solely between a party and its own legal adviser remain privileged. The fourth defendant must disclose relevant documents and file an affidavit explaining all circumstances leading to its retirement as trustee, including specified details.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Fourth defendant must file an affidavit explaining all circumstances leading to its retirement, including specified details.
- First, second, fourth, and eighth defendants must disclose all relevant documents except communications solely between a party and its own legal adviser.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment