AG -v- Rahman [2016] JRC 136A (12 August 2016)

AG -v- Rahman [2016] JRC 136A (12 August 2016)

Due to breach of probation and continued offending, custodial sentence is warranted, but mitigation and time spent on remand justify reduction from recommended sentence.

Citation
[2016] JRC 136A
Parties
Defendant: Rahman; Prosecutor: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
12 August 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Breach of Probation, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rahman

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 appropriate sentence for breach of probation order following drug offence

Ratio Decidendi

Due to breach of probation and continued offending, custodial sentence is warranted, but mitigation and time spent on remand justify reduction from recommended sentence.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 12 months and 2 weeks' imprisonment