AG -v- Burrow and Others [2010] JRC 070 (01 April 2010)
Sentences for importation and possession of heroin must reflect the seriousness of the offence, but substantial mitigation—including personal use, delay, and good character—can justify significant reduction. Deportation is not proportionate where it would have a dramatic effect on family and the offence is a first offence for personal use.
- Citation
- [2010] JRC 070
- Parties
- Defendant: Ramalho; Defendant: Burrow; Defendant: Da Silva
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigation, Deportation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ramalho
Defendant
Burrow
Defendant
Da Silva
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentence for importation and possession of heroin for personal use
- 2 Consideration of mitigation including delay, personal use, and good character
- 3 Propriety and proportionality of deportation recommendation
Ratio Decidendi
Sentences for importation and possession of heroin must reflect the seriousness of the offence, but substantial mitigation—including personal use, delay, and good character—can justify significant reduction. Deportation is not proportionate where it would have a dramatic effect on family and the offence is a first offence for personal use.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Ramalho: 4 years' imprisonment (Count 1), 3 years' imprisonment concurrent (Count 4)
- Burrow: 3 years' imprisonment (Count 1), 6 months' imprisonment concurrent (Count 3)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment