Jersey Judgment

Randalls v Rozel Bay Hotel Ltd. [2005] JLR_Note 33 (04 August 2005)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court considered whether the applicant had shown sufficient cause to set aside the default judgment.

02

Material facts

Parties

Randalls

Applicant

Rozel Bay Hotel Ltd.

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil / Application to Set Aside Default Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the default judgment should be set aside

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    civil procedure rules

    The court has discretion to set aside a default judgment if sufficient cause is shown.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court considered whether the applicant had shown sufficient cause to set aside the default judgment.

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

Judgment

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Randalls v Rozel Bay Hotel Ltd. [2005] JLR_Note 33 (04 August 2005) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR05N033.html Cite as: [2005] JLR_Note 33 [ New search ] [ Help ] Randalls v Rozel Bay Hotel Ltd. 2005 JLR Note 33 (04 August 2005) Civil Procedure-judgments and orders-default judgment-setting aside The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2005 JLR Note 33 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2005/JLR05N033.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.