1998/176 - AG v Rawlinson and Oeillet [1998] UR 176 (18 August 1998)
The court imposed substantial custodial sentences to reflect the seriousness of the robberies, the preparation and use of weapons, and to serve as a deterrent to others, in line with established legal principles and prior authorities.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 176
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: Rawlinson; Defendant: Oeillet
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 18 August 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Robbery, Sentencing, Deterrence, Shop Crime, Use of Weapons, Forfeiture, Driving Disqualification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Rawlinson
Defendant
Oeillet
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentences for robbery and related offences
- 2 Deterrence as a sentencing principle for shop robberies
- 3 Sentencing for use of weapons and preparation for crime
Ratio Decidendi
The court imposed substantial custodial sentences to reflect the seriousness of the robberies, the preparation and use of weapons, and to serve as a deterrent to others, in line with established legal principles and prior authorities.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Rawlinson sentenced to 5 years and 11 months imprisonment on multiple counts, with driving disqualification for 12 months on counts 2 and 3.
- Oeillet sentenced to 6 years and 9 months imprisonment on multiple counts, fines of £100 on counts 4, 6, and 11 or 1 month imprisonment in default, and driving disqualification for 2 years on count 5.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment