A Settlement [2010] JRC 085 (04 May 2010)
The Court has jurisdiction under Article 51 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 to order disclosure from the D directors, as they are connected with the trust and the information is necessary for the fair administration and division of trust assets. The interests of justice and the supervisory role of the Court require such disclosure, especially where the directors have submitted to the Court's jurisdiction and the trustee is otherwise entitled to the information through corporate structures. The Court declines to require unnecessary litigation and costs where disclosure is inevitable and necessary for a just resolution.
- Citation
- [2010] JRC 085
- Parties
- Applicant: RBC; First Respondents: D beneficiaries (G, H, I, K, F); Third Respondents: B beneficiaries (R, S, U, P); Fourth Respondents: C beneficiaries (L, T, L's children)
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Administration Application / Post Mediation Review and Directions
- Outcome
- Disclosure order granted
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Powers, Disclosure Orders, Beneficiary Rights, Trust Asset Division, Court Supervision of Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RBC
Applicant
D beneficiaries (G, H, I, K, F)
First Respondents
B beneficiaries (R, S, U, P)
Third Respondents
C beneficiaries (L, T, L's children)
Fourth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Trust Administration Application / Post Mediation Review and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should order disclosure of information from the D directors under Article 51 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984
- 2 Whether such disclosure is necessary for the fair separation of trust assets among beneficiaries
- 3 Whether the Court's jurisdiction extends to ordering disclosure from directors of companies connected to the trust
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has jurisdiction under Article 51 of the Trusts (Jersey) Law 1984 to order disclosure from the D directors, as they are connected with the trust and the information is necessary for the fair administration and division of trust assets. The interests of justice and the supervisory role of the Court require such disclosure, especially where the directors have submitted to the Court's jurisdiction and the trustee is otherwise entitled to the information through corporate structures. The Court declines to require unnecessary litigation and costs where disclosure is inevitable and necessary for a just resolution.
Court Disposition
Disclosure order granted
Orders
- D directors to provide disclosure as set out in paragraph 26 of the 25th November 2009 judgment, extended to 2009, within 28 days of the order.
- Mr Cadin to prepare a draft order for consideration by the Court and parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment