Jersey Judgment

Representation of RSA and NWL [2011] JRC 183 (23 September 2011)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The scheme is fair to all parties, procedural requirements have been satisfied, and no policyholder will be adversely affected; therefore, the scheme is sanctioned.

Court disposition

scheme sanctioned

Orders

  • Order made in terms of the draft supplied to the Court

02

Material facts

Parties

Royal Scottish Assurance Plc

Transferor

National Westminster Life Assurance Limited

Transferor

Aviva Life and Pensions UK Limited

Transferee

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Insurance Business Transfer Sanction Application / Final Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The scheme complies with all procedural requirements as modified by the Court, is fair to all parties, and does not adversely affect policyholders' reasonable benefit expectations as confirmed by an independent actuary. No objections have been raised by policyholders or regulators.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Re Norwich Union Life Assurance Society [1997] JLR N 12c

    Court must ensure compliance with procedural requirements and fairness to all interested parties in insurance business transfer schemes

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The scheme is fair to all parties, procedural requirements have been satisfied, and no policyholder will be adversely affected; therefore, the scheme is sanctioned.

Court disposition

scheme sanctioned

  • Order made in terms of the draft supplied to the Court

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2011] JRC 183

judgment the bailiff: 1. This is an application pursuant to Article 27 and Schedule 2 of the Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996 seeking the sanction of the Court to a scheme which involves the transfer of the long term insurance business carried on by Royal Scottish Assurance Plc and National Westminster Life Assurance Limited in or from within Jersey to Aviva Life and Pensions UK Limited. All three companies are ultimately owned by Aviva Plc and therefore this is an intra group transfer. The scheme is part of a larger transfer which relates to similar business carried on in the UK and where the approval of the High Court in London is being sought.

2. The test to be applied by the Court in such cases is well established. See for example Re Norwich Union Life Assurance Society [1997] JLR N 12c. The Court must first consider whether the necessary procedural requirements have been complied with. These are set out in the Law and the Schedule although there is an ability for the Court to modify them and the Court did so on this occasion on th June. We are satisfied that the requirements of the Law as modified by that order have been complied with from the affidavits that we have seen.

3. Secondly, the Court must consider whether the scheme is fair to all interested parties. In particular whether any policy holders will be adversely affected. In this respect we note the following:- (i) The independent actuary has produced a report confirming that the transfers are not likely to affect adversely the reasonable benefit expectations of policy holders of any of the companies; (ii) The High Court in England has approved the UK scheme; (iii) The Jersey Financial Services Commission has no objection to the scheme; (iv) The Comptroller of Income Tax in Jersey has confirmed that no implications arise for Jersey policy holders in relation to Jersey tax as a result of the Jersey scheme; (v) Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs have given a similar confirmation in respect of UK tax; (vi) No policy holder has lodged or notified any objections to the transfer with any of the companies and no policy holder has appeared today to object. In all the circumstances we are satisfied that the scheme is fair to all parties and may properly be approved, which is what we do.

4. We therefore make an order in the terms of the draft supplied to us. Authorities Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996. Re Norwich Union Life Insurance Society [1997] JLR N 12c. Page Last Updated: 18 Aug 2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Re Norwich Union Life Assurance Society [1997] JLR N 12c

Case cited

Insurance Business (Jersey) Law 1996

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.