Booth -v- Viscount (En desastre) [2016] JRC 049 (25 February 2016)
The Viscount acted reasonably in marketing and valuing the property through estate agents; the representor failed to demonstrate that the Viscount's actions were unreasonable or that intervention was warranted under the supervisory jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2016] JRC 049
- Parties
- Applicant: Representor (Booth); Respondent: The Viscount
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Representation in Désastre Proceedings / Interlocutory Application—court Intervention in Asset Sale
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Court Supervision of Liquidator, Asset Sale Under Désastre, Valuation Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Representor (Booth)
Applicant
The Viscount
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representation in Désastre Proceedings / Interlocutory Application—court Intervention in Asset Sale
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the Court intervene in the Viscount's conduct of the sale of Beaumont Hill House under désastre?
- 2 Was the property being sold at an undervalue?
- 3 Does the representor have standing to challenge the Viscount's decisions?
Ratio Decidendi
The Viscount acted reasonably in marketing and valuing the property through estate agents; the representor failed to demonstrate that the Viscount's actions were unreasonable or that intervention was warranted under the supervisory jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The Court will not interfere with the Viscount's conduct of the sale; the Viscount is free to accept the reduced offer of £800,000 or any other reasonable offer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment