In the matter of the Estate of Constantin Mattas [2022] JRC 237 (03 November 2022)
The proceedings are an action in rem because the Court's determination of entitlement to the trust fund will be valid against the world; therefore, section 12(1) of the State Immunity Act 1978 does not apply, and substituted service is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2022] JRC 237
- Parties
- Testator: Constantin Mattas (deceased); Applicant: Representor (Trustee); Respondent: Greek Government
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Trust Dispute / Preliminary Procedural Ruling
- Outcome
- Substituted service ordered
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Trust, Service of Process on Foreign State, Action in Rem Vs in Personam
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Constantin Mattas (deceased)
Testator
Representor (Trustee)
Applicant
Greek Government
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Trust Dispute / Preliminary Procedural Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Intended Capital Trust creates a valid trust
- 2 Whether the proceedings are an action in rem
- 3 How the Greek Government should be served
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings are an action in rem because the Court's determination of entitlement to the trust fund will be valid against the world; therefore, section 12(1) of the State Immunity Act 1978 does not apply, and substituted service is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Substituted service ordered
Orders
- Substituted service to be effected by post and email upon the Education Office of the Greek Embassy in London
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment