Parujan v Atlantic Western Trustees [2002] JRC 155 (19 August 2002)

Parujan v Atlantic Western Trustees [2002] JRC 155 (19 August 2002)

Given the protracted nature of the proceedings and the need for an orderly conclusion, the Court directs a timetable for trial, cross-examination of the independent reviewer, and the filing of affidavits to ensure a fair and efficient hearing.

Citation
[2002] JRC 155
Parties
Applicant: Representor; Respondent: Trustee
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
19 August 2002
Procedural Posture
Representation / Directions Hearing
Outcome
Directions granted
Legal Topics
Removal of Trustee, Audit of Trustee Fees, Court Directions, Cross Examination of Independent Reviewer
Trust Law Removal of Trustee Audit of Trustee Fees Court Directions Cross Examination of Independent Reviewer

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Representor

Applicant

Trustee

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Representation / Directions Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trustee should be removed from office
  2. 2 Whether an audit of trustee fees is warranted
  3. 3 Whether the independent reviewer should be cross-examined

Ratio Decidendi

Given the protracted nature of the proceedings and the need for an orderly conclusion, the Court directs a timetable for trial, cross-examination of the independent reviewer, and the filing of affidavits to ensure a fair and efficient hearing.

Court Disposition

Directions granted

Orders

  • Counsel to arrange two-day trial in November or December 2002
  • Mr. Royan Ellis to be convened for cross-examination on his report