C v D (Matrimonial) 19-Aug-2019 [2019] JRC 159 (19 August 2019)
The agreement was not vitiated by non-disclosure because the petitioner's financial resources, including the widow's pension, were openly disclosed as an income stream, the respondent was fully aware of the pension from tax returns and documentation, and there was no misrepresentation or concealment. The court found no grounds to displace the agreement, which was properly and fairly arrived at with competent legal advice.
- Citation
- [2019] JRC 159
- Parties
- Petitioner: Petitioner; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Matrimonial Ancillary Relief / Post Agreement, Application for Court Approval of Settlement
- Outcome
- Agreement approved; ancillary relief order granted as per terms of the parties' agreement.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Consent Orders, Non Disclosure, Clean Break, Spousal Maintenance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petitioner
Petitioner
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Matrimonial Ancillary Relief / Post Agreement, Application for Court Approval of Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement between the parties should be set aside for material non-disclosure by the petitioner
- 2 Whether the court should approve the ancillary relief agreement as fair
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement was not vitiated by non-disclosure because the petitioner's financial resources, including the widow's pension, were openly disclosed as an income stream, the respondent was fully aware of the pension from tax returns and documentation, and there was no misrepresentation or concealment. The court found no grounds to displace the agreement, which was properly and fairly arrived at with competent legal advice.
Court Disposition
Agreement approved; ancillary relief order granted as per terms of the parties' agreement.
Orders
- Petitioner retains her property.
- Respondent pays petitioner a lump sum of £495,523.50 as soon as possible.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment