B v M-R [2007] JRC 154 (08 August 2007)
The Petitioner is found in contempt for failing to comply with the Court's order to provide information about the children's lives and is fined. Supervised contact is not ordered due to expert evidence that it would be detrimental to child S, and the Respondent's application is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2007] JRC 154
- Parties
- Petitioner: Petitioner; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Petitioner found in contempt and fined; Respondent's application for supervised contact dismissed; Petitioner ordered to pay Respondent's costs.
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Parental Responsibility, Contempt, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Petitioner
Petitioner
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Petitioner is in contempt of court for failing to provide information about the children's lives
- 2 Whether supervised contact between the Respondent and child S should be ordered
- 3 Obligation to encourage contact between children and Respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The Petitioner is found in contempt for failing to comply with the Court's order to provide information about the children's lives and is fined. Supervised contact is not ordered due to expert evidence that it would be detrimental to child S, and the Respondent's application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Petitioner found in contempt and fined; Respondent's application for supervised contact dismissed; Petitioner ordered to pay Respondent's costs.
Orders
- Petitioner to pay a fine of £1,000 within 7 days or serve 10 days imprisonment in default.
- Respondent's application for supervised contact dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment