F -v- G (Matrimonial) [2013] JRC 015 (23 January 2013)

F -v- G (Matrimonial) [2013] JRC 015 (23 January 2013)

The court refused the application for further disclosure because sufficient information had already been provided, further disclosure would cause unjustified expense and delay, and there was no evidence that the B Settlement was a resource available to the Petitioner. The threshold for compelling further disclosure had not been met.

Citation
[2013] JRC 015
Parties
Petitioner: Petitioner; Respondent: Respondent
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Divorce Ancillary Relief / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Trust Documents, Ancillary Relief, Resources Available for Financial Provision
Family Law Trust Law Disclosure of Trust Documents Ancillary Relief Resources Available for Financial Provision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petitioner

Petitioner

Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Ancillary Relief / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether further disclosure of documents relating to the K Trust and B Settlement should be ordered in the context of ancillary relief proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court refused the application for further disclosure because sufficient information had already been provided, further disclosure would cause unjustified expense and delay, and there was no evidence that the B Settlement was a resource available to the Petitioner. The threshold for compelling further disclosure had not been met.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • No order for further disclosure of documents relating to the K Trust or B Settlement.