In the matter of WW [2010] JRC 166B (14 September 2010)

In the matter of WW [2010] JRC 166B (14 September 2010)

The court determined that the father's income allows for a higher interim maintenance payment. Applying the CSA formula to his actual income, the court ordered £2,024 per month for two children, finding this amount fair and affordable, and declining to reduce maintenance for time spent with the father.

Citation
[2010] JRC 166B
Parties
Petitioner: Petitioner (Mother); Respondent: Respondent (Father)
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
14 September 2010
Procedural Posture
Interim Child Maintenance Application / Interim Hearing
Outcome
Interim order for increased child maintenance granted
Legal Topics
Child Maintenance, Interim Orders, Financial Provision
Family Law Child Maintenance Interim Orders Financial Provision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 19
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Petitioner (Mother)

Petitioner

Respondent (Father)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interim Child Maintenance Application / Interim Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate interim child maintenance amount
  2. 2 Consideration of parties' incomes and expenditures
  3. 3 Application of CSA formula

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the father's income allows for a higher interim maintenance payment. Applying the CSA formula to his actual income, the court ordered £2,024 per month for two children, finding this amount fair and affordable, and declining to reduce maintenance for time spent with the father.

Court Disposition

Interim order for increased child maintenance granted

Orders

  • Father to pay interim child maintenance of £2,024 per month for two children
  • Costs reserved to next hearing