Cook v Clapham and Ors [2023] JCA 005 (13 January 2023)
Leave to appeal is refused because the proposed appeal has no real prospect of success; the Royal Court's refusal to allow amendment and grant of summary judgment was unexceptionable, as the Appellant's claims are unsupported by evidence, inadequately pleaded, and there is no triable issue.
- Citation
- [2023] JCA 005
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Herbert Aster Maurice Cook; Respondent: Michael Henry Clapham; Respondent: Andrew David Le Cheminant; Respondent: Leslie Rufus Crapp
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Amendment of Pleadings, Fraudulent Breach of Trust, Prescription, Exoneration Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Herbert Aster Maurice Cook
Appellant
Michael Henry Clapham
Respondent
Andrew David Le Cheminant
Respondent
Leslie Rufus Crapp
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against refusal to amend Order of Justice and grant of summary judgment
- 2 Whether the Appellant's claim regarding assets in the Fine Art Trust has real prospects of success
- 3 Whether allegations of fraud and misappropriation are sufficiently particularised and supported by evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal is refused because the proposed appeal has no real prospect of success; the Royal Court's refusal to allow amendment and grant of summary judgment was unexceptionable, as the Appellant's claims are unsupported by evidence, inadequately pleaded, and there is no triable issue.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment