Jersey Judgment

Robertson v Slous [2000] JLR 246 (12 July 2000)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

A derivative action cannot be pursued under the exception to Foss v. Harbottle if the plaintiff has alternative remedies available.

Court disposition

Derivative action unavailable

02

Material facts

Parties

Robertson

Plaintiff

Slous

Defendant

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Derivative Action / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether a derivative action can be brought under the exception to Foss v. Harbottle when alternative remedies are available

Party arguments

Applicant
The plaintiff sought to bring a derivative action in respect of a corporate wrong, relying on the exception to the rule in Foss v. Harbottle.
Respondent
The defendant argued that a derivative action was unavailable because alternative remedies existed.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Foss v. Harbottle

    A derivative action under the exception to Foss v. Harbottle is unavailable if alternative remedies are available.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

A derivative action cannot be pursued under the exception to Foss v. Harbottle if the plaintiff has alternative remedies available.

Court disposition

Derivative action unavailable

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2000] JLR 246

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Robertson v Slous [2000] JLR 246 (12 July 2000) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR000246.html Cite as: [2000] JLR 246 [ New search ] [ Help ] Robertson v Slous 2000 JLR 246 (12 July 2000) Companies - legal proceedings - action in respect of corporate wrong - derivative action under exception to Foss v. Harbottle unavailable if alternative remedies available The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 2000 JLR 246 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/2000/JLR000246.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Foss v. Harbottle

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.