Robertson Ward Intl. Ltd. v Diamond (Jersey) Ltd. [1992] JLR_Note 2a (21 October 1992)
The court considered the allocation of costs following the substitution of the plaintiff in the proceedings.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Robertson Ward Intl. Ltd.; Defendant: Diamond (Jersey) Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Application Following Substitution of Plaintiff
- Outcome
- costs order made
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Substitution of Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Robertson Ward Intl. Ltd.
Plaintiff
Diamond (Jersey) Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Application Following Substitution of Plaintiff
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded upon substitution of plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered the allocation of costs following the substitution of the plaintiff in the proceedings.
Court Disposition
costs order made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment