Rocque v Lt. Gov. [1998] JLR 246 (16 July 1998)
The court held that the requirement of equal treatment in Protocol No. 3, art. 4 should not be interpreted so as to apply indirectly rules not otherwise applicable in Jersey, such as rules on free movement of workers.
- Citation
- [1998] JLR 246
- Parties
- Applicant: Rocque; Respondent: Lieutenant Governor
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Treatment, Limitation on Equal Treatment, Act of Accession, Protocol No. 3, Art. 4, Free Movement of Workers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Rocque
Applicant
Lieutenant Governor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirement of equal treatment in Act of Accession, Protocol No. 3, art. 4 applies to indirectly introduce rules not otherwise applicable in Jersey, such as rules on free movement of workers.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the requirement of equal treatment in Protocol No. 3, art. 4 should not be interpreted so as to apply indirectly rules not otherwise applicable in Jersey, such as rules on free movement of workers.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment