Rocque v Lt. Gov. [1998] JLR 246 (16 July 1998)

Rocque v Lt. Gov. [1998] JLR 246 (16 July 1998)

The court held that the requirement of equal treatment in Protocol No. 3, art. 4 should not be interpreted so as to apply indirectly rules not otherwise applicable in Jersey, such as rules on free movement of workers.

Citation
[1998] JLR 246
Parties
Applicant: Rocque; Respondent: Lieutenant Governor
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
16 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Equal Treatment, Limitation on Equal Treatment, Act of Accession, Protocol No. 3, Art. 4, Free Movement of Workers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rocque

Applicant

Lieutenant Governor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the requirement of equal treatment in Act of Accession, Protocol No. 3, art. 4 applies to indirectly introduce rules not otherwise applicable in Jersey, such as rules on free movement of workers.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the requirement of equal treatment in Protocol No. 3, art. 4 should not be interpreted so as to apply indirectly rules not otherwise applicable in Jersey, such as rules on free movement of workers.

Court Disposition

application dismissed