1998/76 - AG v Humber [1998] UR 76 (17 April 1998)

1998/76 - AG v Humber [1998] UR 76 (17 April 1998)

Exceptional personal and family circumstances, including ongoing care responsibilities and rehabilitation from addiction, justify a probation order instead of imprisonment despite the general policy for custodial sentences in drug trafficking cases.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] UR 76
Parties
Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: Rodney Francis Humber
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
17 April 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
probation order
Legal Topics
Possession of Controlled Drugs, Supply of Controlled Drugs, Possession With Intent to Supply, Sentencing, Mitigation
Criminal Law Possession of Controlled Drugs Supply of Controlled Drugs Possession With Intent to Supply Sentencing Mitigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Attorney General

Prosecutor

Rodney Francis Humber

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

  1. 1 appropriate sentence for possession, supply, and possession with intent to supply cannabis resin

Ratio Decidendi

Exceptional personal and family circumstances, including ongoing care responsibilities and rehabilitation from addiction, justify a probation order instead of imprisonment despite the general policy for custodial sentences in drug trafficking cases.

Court Disposition

probation order

Orders

  • Defendant placed on probation for one year on all counts, concurrent, subject to usual conditions.
  • No community service ordered.