1998/76 - AG v Humber [1998] UR 76 (17 April 1998)
Exceptional personal and family circumstances, including ongoing care responsibilities and rehabilitation from addiction, justify a probation order instead of imprisonment despite the general policy for custodial sentences in drug trafficking cases.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UR 76
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Attorney General; Defendant: Rodney Francis Humber
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- probation order
- Legal Topics
- Possession of Controlled Drugs, Supply of Controlled Drugs, Possession With Intent to Supply, Sentencing, Mitigation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Attorney General
Prosecutor
Rodney Francis Humber
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 appropriate sentence for possession, supply, and possession with intent to supply cannabis resin
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional personal and family circumstances, including ongoing care responsibilities and rehabilitation from addiction, justify a probation order instead of imprisonment despite the general policy for custodial sentences in drug trafficking cases.
Court Disposition
probation order
Orders
- Defendant placed on probation for one year on all counts, concurrent, subject to usual conditions.
- No community service ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment