In re Rosedale Invs. v [1995] JLR 123 (30 March 1995)
A hearing will only be held in camera if excluding the public is the only way to do justice.
- Citation
- [1995] JLR 123
- Parties
- Applicant: Rosedale Investments
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for in Camera Hearing
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- In Camera Proceedings, Open Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Rosedale Investments
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for in Camera Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hearing should be held in camera at the court's discretion
- 2 What is the test for excluding the public from proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
A hearing will only be held in camera if excluding the public is the only way to do justice.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment