AG v RR [2023] JRC 061 (19 April 2023)
Given the defendant's repeated breaches of probation, bail, and care orders, his history of violent offending, and the likelihood of a custodial sentence, the Youth Court's decision to grant bail was unreasonable. The statutory exceptions to bail were satisfied, and remand in custody was necessary to protect the public and ensure compliance.
- Citation
- [2023] JRC 061
- Parties
- Defendant: RR; Prosecution: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (bail) / Appeal Against Grant of Bail Pending Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; bail revoked; defendant remanded in custody pending sentence.
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Youth Offenders, Sentencing, Violent Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RR
Defendant
The Crown
Prosecution
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (bail) / Appeal Against Grant of Bail Pending Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Youth Court's decision to grant bail to a 15-year-old defendant convicted of multiple violent offences was unreasonable in the circumstances
- 2 Whether the statutory exceptions to bail under the Criminal Procedure (Bail) (Jersey) Law 2017 apply
Ratio Decidendi
Given the defendant's repeated breaches of probation, bail, and care orders, his history of violent offending, and the likelihood of a custodial sentence, the Youth Court's decision to grant bail was unreasonable. The statutory exceptions to bail were satisfied, and remand in custody was necessary to protect the public and ensure compliance.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; bail revoked; defendant remanded in custody pending sentence.
Orders
- Defendant remanded in custody.
- Case remitted to the Youth Court for sentencing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment