In the matter of the Sanne Trust Company Limited [2009] JRC 025B (16 February 2009)
A genuine mistake was made in drafting the trust deed as a discretionary trust instead of an interest in possession trust; full and frank disclosure was made; no other practical remedy existed; rectification was granted to substitute the correct trust form with retrospective effect.
- Citation
- [2009] JRC 025B
- Parties
- Applicant: Sanne Trust Company Limited; Settlor: Mr C; Guardian Ad Litem: Mr Goulborn
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Rectification of Trust / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trust, Mistake in Trust Drafting, Interest in Possession Trust, Discretionary Trust, Confidentiality of Beneficiaries
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sanne Trust Company Limited
Applicant
Mr C
Settlor
Mr Goulborn
Guardian Ad Litem
Procedural Posture
Application for Rectification of Trust / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the C family settlement should be rectified due to mistake in drafting
- 2 Whether the trust should have been established as an interest in possession trust instead of a discretionary trust
- 3 Whether the requirements for rectification are satisfied
Ratio Decidendi
A genuine mistake was made in drafting the trust deed as a discretionary trust instead of an interest in possession trust; full and frank disclosure was made; no other practical remedy existed; rectification was granted to substitute the correct trust form with retrospective effect.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Rectification of the C family settlement to create an interest in possession trust with retrospective effect from 5th July, 1999
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment