Santos Costa v AG [1996] JRC 056 (21 March 1996)
- Citation
- [1996] JRC 056
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
More details
- Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court determined the prosecution was valid based on compliance with procedural requirements.
Court disposition
application dismissed
02
Material facts
Parties
Santos Costa
ApplicantAttorney General
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal / Judgment
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the prosecution against Santos Costa was valid
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Jersey criminal law
The validity of criminal prosecution depends on adherence to procedural requirements.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court determined the prosecution was valid based on compliance with procedural requirements.
Court disposition
application dismissed
Source and reliance status
Official court record
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Court record
Judgment
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [
DONATE ] Jersey Unreported Judgments You are here:
BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Unreported Judgments >> Santos Costa v AG [1996] JRC 056 (21 March 1996) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1996/1996_056.html Cite as: [1996] JRC 056, [1996] JRC 56 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Santos Costa v AG [1996] JRC 056 (21 March 1996) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [1996] JRC 056 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/UR/1996/1996_056.html
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.