Jersey Judgment

Sauvage v Ag. & Fish. Cttee. [1991] JLR 60 (01 May 1991)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

There is no bad faith in revoking a licence for a commercial piggery even if it injures private interests, provided the decision is taken in the public interest for reasons of hygiene.

Court disposition

application dismissed

02

Material facts

Parties

Sauvage

Applicant

Agriculture & Fisheries Committee

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Administrative Law / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether revocation of a commercial piggery licence constituted administrative malfeasance or bad faith

Party arguments

Applicant
Revocation of the licence was done in bad faith and injured private interests.
Respondent
Revocation was in the public interest for reasons of hygiene, not motivated by malice or improper reasons.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Jersey Law Reports 1991 JLR 60

    Bad faith in administrative law has a subjective meaning equivalent to malice, i.e., personal spite or desire to injure for improper reasons.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

There is no bad faith in revoking a licence for a commercial piggery even if it injures private interests, provided the decision is taken in the public interest for reasons of hygiene.

Court disposition

application dismissed

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[1991] JLR 60

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] Jersey Law Reports You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> Jersey Law Reports >> Sauvage v Ag. & Fish. Cttee. [1991] JLR 60 (01 May 1991) URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1991/JLR910060.html Cite as: [1991] JLR 60 [ New search ] [ Help ] Sauvage v Ag. & Fish. Cttee. 1991 JLR 60 (01 May 1991) Administrative Law - administrative malfeasance - bad faith - has subjective meaning equivalent to malice, i.e. personal spite or desire to injure for improper reasons-no bad faith in revoking licence for commercial piggery even if injures private interests if decision taken in public interest for reasons of hygiene The document you wish to view is available to registered users or can be purchased as a PDF. To purchase this document in PDF format or alternatively to Register to purchase membership go to the Jersey Law website via this link: 1991 JLR 60 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/je/cases/JLR/1991/JLR910060.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.