Sayers v Briggs and Co. [1964] JJ 423 (22 December 1964)
A trader or business whose name is known in the Island is entitled to protection against passing off, and infraction may be presumed if the infractor has no legitimate claim to the name.
- Citation
- [1964] JJ 423
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Sayers; Defendant: Briggs and Co.
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 1964
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Passing Off, Use of Name, Trademark Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Sayers
Plaintiff
Briggs and Co.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of a name known in the Island as denoting a particular trader or business is entitled to protection against passing off
- 2 Whether infraction requires proof that the infractor is commonly known by the name or that it describes his business or goods
- 3 Whether infraction may be presumed if the infractor has no claim to the name
Ratio Decidendi
A trader or business whose name is known in the Island is entitled to protection against passing off, and infraction may be presumed if the infractor has no legitimate claim to the name.
Court Disposition
judgment for plaintiff
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment