AG -v- Constructions Industrielles and Spie [2012] JRC 220 (23 November 2012)

AG -v- Constructions Industrielles and Spie [2012] JRC 220 (23 November 2012)

The accident was preventable and occurred due to failures in joint health and safety systems and communication between the two companies, warranting a significant fine regardless of company size or wealth.

Citation
[2012] JRC 220
Parties
Defendant: SBC; Defendant: CNIM
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
23 November 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment
Outcome
conviction and fine
Legal Topics
Workplace Safety, Corporate Liability, Industrial Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SBC

Defendant

CNIM

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Prosecution / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendants failed to implement adequate health and safety measures resulting in a preventable workplace accident
  2. 2 Whether the size or wealth of the defendant companies should affect the quantum of fine

Ratio Decidendi

The accident was preventable and occurred due to failures in joint health and safety systems and communication between the two companies, warranting a significant fine regardless of company size or wealth.

Court Disposition

conviction and fine

Orders

  • Each defendant fined £25,000
  • Each defendant to pay £2,500 towards costs of investigation and prosecution, payable within one month