Scobie v Att. Gen. [2003] JLR_Note 2 (16 January 2003)
The court considered whether absconding could be treated as a mitigating factor in sentencing, depending on the facts of the case.
- Parties
- Applicant: Scobie; Respondent: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Jersey
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- judgment delivered
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Mitigation, Absconding
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Scobie
Applicant
Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether absconding can be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing
Ratio Decidendi
The court considered whether absconding could be treated as a mitigating factor in sentencing, depending on the facts of the case.
Court Disposition
judgment delivered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment