AG v Seal [2002] JRC 32 (04 February 2002)

AG v Seal [2002] JRC 32 (04 February 2002)

There were no exceptional circumstances to justify a departure from the established policy of imposing a custodial sentence for breach of trust by a financial adviser, even though the defendant did not personally benefit and had mitigating factors.

Citation
[2002] JRC 32
Parties
Defendant: Seal; Prosecutor: Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
04 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced to custody
Legal Topics
Fraudulent Conversion, Breach of Trust, Sentencing, Mitigation, Fiduciary Duty
Criminal Law Financial Regulation Fraudulent Conversion Breach of Trust Sentencing Mitigation Fiduciary Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Seal

Defendant

Crown

Prosecutor

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify a non-custodial sentence for fraudulent conversion by a financial adviser
  2. 2 Whether absence of personal financial gain constitutes an exceptional circumstance

Ratio Decidendi

There were no exceptional circumstances to justify a departure from the established policy of imposing a custodial sentence for breach of trust by a financial adviser, even though the defendant did not personally benefit and had mitigating factors.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced to custody

Orders

  • Defendant sentenced to 15 months imprisonment