AG - Oeillet 31-Mar-2006 [2006] JRC 053 (31 March 2006)

AG - Oeillet 31-Mar-2006 [2006] JRC 053 (31 March 2006)

Given the high risk of re-offending, lack of compliance with supervision, and the defendant's criminal record, consecutive and concurrent sentences were imposed in accordance with the totality principle.

Citation
[2006] JRC 053
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
31 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Breach of Probation, Consecutive Sentences, Concurrent Sentences, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Sentencing Breach of Probation Consecutive Sentences Concurrent Sentences Totality Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Appropriate sentence for multiple indictments and breach of probation
  2. 2 Application of totality principle in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

Given the high risk of re-offending, lack of compliance with supervision, and the defendant's criminal record, consecutive and concurrent sentences were imposed in accordance with the totality principle.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • 3 months' imprisonment on First Indictment
  • 18 months' imprisonment on Second Indictment, consecutive to First Indictment