AG v Lloyd 24-Jul_2023 [2023] JRC 129 (24 July 2023)

AG v Lloyd 24-Jul_2023 [2023] JRC 129 (24 July 2023)

The defendant was sentenced based on the seriousness of commercial drug dealing, including supply into prison, with aggravating factors such as offending while on probation and prior convictions. Mitigation for naming a supplier was rejected due to lack of credibility. Sentences were imposed consecutively and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] JRC 129
Parties
Defendant: Shane Lloyd; Prosecution: The Crown
Jurisdiction
Jersey
Judgment Date
24 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing Judgment
Outcome
convicted and sentenced
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Forfeiture, Confiscation, Prison Supply Offences
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Forfeiture Confiscation Prison Supply Offences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Shane Lloyd

Defendant

The Crown

Prosecution

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Sentencing Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Sentencing for possession and supply of controlled drugs
  2. 2 Sentencing for supply of drugs into prison
  3. 3 Mitigation for providing information on supplier

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant was sentenced based on the seriousness of commercial drug dealing, including supply into prison, with aggravating factors such as offending while on probation and prior convictions. Mitigation for naming a supplier was rejected due to lack of credibility. Sentences were imposed consecutively and concurrently as appropriate, applying the totality principle.

Court Disposition

convicted and sentenced

Orders

  • Imprisonment for a total of 11 years and 4 months
  • Forfeiture and destruction of drugs, paraphernalia, and mobile telephone